Main Page
Contact us    Main Page    Add favourites

...: T.C. DİYANET İŞLERİ BAŞKANLIĞI :...

Information

 

Press Releases

 

Messages, Speeches, Papers etc.

 

Legal Opinions 

Frequently Asked Questions

 

Do We Know These?

 

Web Library

 

Prayer Times  

Webmaster  

 


May 2013 The number of visitors this month

 [ 5741 ]

Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı
Eskişehir Yolu 9. km.
Çankaya-ANKARA-TURKEY
Phone: 0312 295 70 00

..: Messages, Speeches, Papers etc. :..

 

Yazıcıya Gönder



Current Religious Issues Consultation Meeting- I. (Final Communiqué) May 18, 2002 İstanbul

The Pre­si­dency of Re­li­gi­ous Af­fa­irs who­se es­sen­ti­al duty is to en­ligh­ten the pub­lic on re­li­gi­ous mat­ters, has un­til now tri­ed to ful­fill this mis­si­on to the best of its abi­lity star­ting from the day it was es­tab­lis­hed.

So­ci­al chan­ges which ha­ve be­en ex­pe­di­ted by the de­ve­lop­ments in sci­en­ti­fic and tech­no­lo­gi­cal are­as ha­ve de­eply inf­lu­en­ced the tra­di­ti­onal un­ders­tan­ding of the re­li­gi­on and in turn ne­ces­si­ta­ted new dis­cus­si­ons over many is­su­es, and ca­used the emer­gen­ce of new prob­lems which are in ne­ed of ur­gent so­lu­ti­ons.

The open dis­cus­si­on of the­se prob­lems, which sho­uld be sol­ved thro­ugh sci­en­ti­fic met­hods, not only ham­per re­ac­hing so­und so­lu­ti­ons but al­so re­sults in men­tal con­fu­si­on and of­fends the re­li­gi­ous sen­ti­ments of our na­ti­on.

In or­der that re­li­gi­ous mat­ters do not re­sult in ten­si­on, and that the pro­po­sed so­lu­ti­ons con­vin­ce and sa­tisfy our fa­ith­ful pe­op­le to the re­li­gi­on, it is ne­ces­sary to adopt met­hods ta­king in­to con­si­de­ra­ti­on both tra­di­ti­onal ex­pe­ri­en­ces and mo­dern de­ve­lop­ments ins­te­ad of ma­king dec­la­ra­ti­ons le­ading to spe­cu­la­ti­ons.

Ba­sing opi­ni­ons on a sci­en­ti­fic met­hod whi­le exp­res­sing vi­ews on re­li­gi­ous mat­ters will not only avo­id the use of re­li­gi­ous so­ur­ces as a me­ans for le­ga­li­za­ti­on but al­so enab­le us to re­ach so­lu­ti­ons which will con­vin­ce the ma­jo­rity of the pe­op­le and ren­der mar­gi­nal ten­den­ci­es inac­ti­ve on re­li­gi­ous is­sues.

The ac­cu­mu­la­ti­on of know­led­ge and ex­pe­ri­en­ce in our Fa­cul­ti­es of The­ology which exa­mi­ne the na­tu­re of re­li­gi­on, the his­to­ric ex­pe­ri­en­ce of Mus­lims and mo­dern re­li­gi­ous issues wit­hin the fra­me­work of aca­de­mic dis­cip­li­nes are suf­fi­ci­ent to over­co­me the­se prob­lems and cons­ti­tu­te a ro­le mo­del for ot­her Is­la­mic co­unt­ri­es.

The Pre­si­dency of Re­li­gi­ous Af­fa­irs has fo­und it ne­ces­sary to be­ne­fit from this ac­cu­mu­la­ti­on of know­led­ge by or­ga­ni­zing a con­sul­ta­ti­on me­eting. Mem­bers of the Hig­her Co­un­cil of Re­li­gi­ous Af­fa­irs and Aca­de­mi­ci­ans met for so­lu­ti­on to the cur­rent re­li­gi­ous issues at a fo­rum which was held in the Is­tan­bul Grand Ta­rab­ya Ho­tel on 15-18 May 2002.

Fo­ur se­pa­ra­te com­mis­si­ons we­re es­tab­lis­hed at this me­eting and the fol­lo­wing sub­jects we­re dis­cus­sed:

1. Tra­di­ti­onal and mo­dern app­ro­ac­hes in un­ders­tan­ding and the in­terp­re­ta­ti­on of re­li­gi­ous texts and their ref­lec­ti­ons on so­ci­ety,

2. Re­li­gi­ous dis­cus­si­ons re­gar­ding wo­men’s prob­lems in the mo­dern world,

3. Dis­cus­si­ons over pilg­ri­ma­ge (hacc),

4. Cur­rent dis­cus­si­ons on acts of wors­hip (iba­dat),

Cer­ta­in prac­ti­cal so­lu­ti­ons we­re fo­und for cer­ta­in prob­lems and im­por­tant steps we­re ta­ken for the so­lu­ti­on of ot­hers. The­se de­ci­si­ons which we­re dis­cus­sed and ac­cep­ted by the Ge­ne­ral Board of the Meeting de­monst­ra­te that the­re is no es­sen­ti­al conf­lict bet­we­en re­li­gi­on and uni­ver­sal va­lu­es and it is pos­sib­le to sol­ve the prob­lems cre­ated by so­ci­al chan­ge thro­ugh a so­und pers­pec­ti­ve.

We ho­pe that the­se de­ci­si­ons will eli­mi­na­te the men­tal con­fu­si­ons on re­li­gi­ous mat­ters, and cont­ri­bu­te to the con­ti­nu­ati­on of so­ci­al comp­ro­mi­se and pe­ace.

The fol­lo­wing de­ci­si­ons we­re pre­pa­red by sub-commissions and ac­cep­ted by the General Bo­ard:

1. It can be mis­le­ading to classify the methods of in­terp­reting and un­ders­tanding re­li­gi­ous texts (Ko­ran and Ha­diths) in­to ca­te­go­ri­es as ‘tra­di­ti­ona­l’ and ‘mo­der­n’. In ad­di­ti­on to the clas­sical met­hods de­ve­lo­ped by Is­la­mic Scho­lars sin­ce the early sta­ges of Is­lam, mo­dern met­hods sho­uld al­so be used in un­ders­tan­ding and in­terp­re­ting re­li­gi­ous texts.

2. Ta­king in­to con­si­de­ra­ti­on that un­ders­tan­ding and in­terp­re­ting re­li­gi­ous texts is a mul­ti­di­men­si­onal ac­ti­vity, a spe­ci­al pro­ject sho­uld be car­ri­ed out and ex­pert me­etings sho­uld be held whe­re dif­fe­rent po­ints of vi­ews are dis­cus­sed. It will be be­ne­fi­ci­al if a se­cond con­sul­ta­ti­on me­eting is held af­ter the first.

It is con­si­de­red app­rop­ri­ate to dis­cuss the fol­lo­wing is­su­es af­ter pre­pa­ra­ti­ons are ma­de for the pre­sen­ta­ti­on of pa­pers and for the de­li­ve­ring of talks:

a) Un­ders­tan­ding and in­terp­re­ta­ti­on,

b) His­to­ri­city,

c) Lan­gu­age,

d) The prob­lems of clas­si­cal met­hods,

e) The dif­fe­ren­ce bet­we­en ac­cep­ting and obe­ying God’s com­mands and as­sing­ment of ca­use and its li­mits,

f) The Prop­het Mo­ham­mad’s position in re­li­gi­on,

g) The re­la­ti­ons­hip bet­we­en the in­tel­lect (aql) and re­ve­la­ti­on (wahy),

h) The re­la­ti­ons­hip bet­we­en re­li­gi­on and so­ci­ety,

i) The re­la­ti­ons­hip bet­we­en re­li­gi­on and sci­en­ce.

3. In a cer­ta­in deg­ree al­be­it sub­jec­ti­vity may be una­vo­idab­le in un­ders­tan­ding and in­terp­re­ting re­li­gi­ous texts, the li­te­ral cannotation of texts, his­to­ric ex­pe­ri­en­ce of Is­la­mic so­ci­eti­es and the un­ders­tan­ding of Ij­ma (con­sen­sus) which forms the ma­in body of this ex­pe­ri­en­ce can be vi­ewed as the fac­tors which re­du­ce this sub­jec­ti­vity to a mi­ni­mal.

4. The following is­su­es sho­uld be ta­ken in­to con­si­de­ra­ti­on es­pe­ci­ally du­ring pub­lic dis­cus­si­ons and in sta­te­ments ma­de con­cer­ning re­li­gi­ous mat­ters:

a) Abi­ding by the prin­cip­le of “dependence on text” whi­le in­terp­re­ting the Ko­ran and Ha­diths.

b) Sta­ting that the pro­po­sals and vi­ews ma­de to find so­lu­ti­ons for the Islamic issues are per­so­nal com­ments and that ot­her vi­ews can be cor­rect the­ore­ti­cally; avo­iding styles of wri­ting and exp­res­si­ons in­di­ca­ting that any com­ment is as an ab­so­lu­te re­ality and thus giving the people the chance of preference.

c) Avo­iding any exp­res­si­ons, which may de­no­te that the ba­sic so­ur­ce of Is­lam is only the Ko­ran and the Sunnah is not re­gar­ded as a so­ur­ce.

5. Clas­si­cal re­li­gi­ous so­ur­ces ref­lect a rich ac­cu­mu­la­ti­on de­ve­lo­ped by the Mus­lim con­cer­ning re­li­gi­ous texts and is­su­es du­ring the his­to­ri­cal pro­cess. The­se are of gre­at im­por­tan­ce sin­ce they ref­lect the intellectual he­ri­ta­ge of the pe­ri­od and the po­ints of vi­ew of the authors, and they cons­ti­tu­te a sec­ti­on of the his­to­ri­cal ex­pe­ri­en­ce of Is­lam. In ad­di­ti­on, the­se clas­si­cal so­ur­ces are not suf­fi­ci­ent as be­ing me­rely a de­ter­mi­na­ti­ve so­ur­ce for the so­lu­ti­on of re­li­gi­ous prob­lems, but if they are comp­le­tely ig­no­red, a di­rect so­lu­ti­on got­ten from the Ko­ran and Ha­diths can al­so ha­ve so­me ne­ga­ti­ve po­ints from the the­ore­ti­cal and prac­ti­cal stand­po­ints.

6. The religious solutions and judgements in the classical sources concerning daily practices of that time are the re­sult of the intellectual and cul­tu­ral he­ri­ta­ge of the pe­ri­od du­ring which they we­re mostly com­po­sed. It will be incor­rect either to per­ce­ive them as part of the ba­sic te­ac­hings of Is­lam or to negate them in advance by com­pa­ring certain se­lec­ted negative examp­les with the contemporary level of information and understanding.

7. Chan­ge in re­li­gi­ous ru­les (ah­kam) from the stand­po­int of ti­me and space can­not oc­cur in the cle­ar and absolute ru­les of re­li­gi­ous texts con­cer­ning ba­sic cre­ed and mo­ral is­su­es and wors­hip. Ge­ne­rally, chan­ges can oc­cur in the per­for­man­ce of the de­ta­ils and con­di­ti­ons of wors­hip, open to ij­ti­had (ori­gi­nal thin­king), and in for­mal le­gal re­gu­la­ti­ons. In this field, different trends may be arised due to the met­hods used and the ef­fect of contemporary understanding and practices.

8. With regard to the religion and change, making ge­ne­ral as­sess­ments depending on so­me in­di­vi­du­al examp­les le­ad to the imp­res­si­on that the­re are clas­hes bet­we­en re­li­gi­on and con­tem­po­rary va­lu­es. This attitude also prevents cor­rect comp­re­hen­si­on of the Ko­ran and Sunnah and overshadows their basic features as a source of gu­idan­ce to a greate extent.

9. The dis­tinc­ti­on bet­we­en the aim and the me­ans (ma­qasid and wa­sail) in re­li­gi­ous ru­les, the pro­per ca­u­se behind them, tho­ught of the pub­lic interest, the met­hods of ij­ti­had, the cri­te­ria con­cer­ning whether or not the reason of the­se religious sti­pu­la­ti­ons can be known and his­to­ri­cal and textual context may cont­ri­bu­te to dis­cus­si­ons held as to what ex­tent and how re­li­gi­ous ru­les can be al­te­red.

10. It will be very use­ful to es­tab­lish a re­se­arch cen­ter wit­hin the Pre­si­dency of Re­li­gi­ous Af­fa­irs which will cre­ate a da­ta­ba­se and sta­tis­tics re­ports in or­der to de­ter­mi­ne the re­li­gi­ous prob­lems of the so­ci­ety and which will cons­ti­tu­te the ba­sis for new in­terp­re­ta­ti­ons me­eting con­tem­po­rary re­qu­ire­ments.

11. Prob­lems re­la­ted to wo­men still exist to­day, as they ha­ve be­en thro­ug­ho­ut the his­tory of man­kind. In es­sen­ce, re­li­gi­ons ha­ve co­me up with im­por­tant re­gu­la­ti­ons for sol­ving the­se prob­lems wit­hin the fra­me­work of rights and jus­ti­ce. In this res­pect, Is­la­mic prin­cip­les ha­ve spe­ci­al im­por­tan­ce. Ho­we­ver, it was dif­fi­cult for the pat­ri­arc­hal com­mu­ni­ti­es to adopt the­se imp­ro­ve­ments which religions have achieved and in the course of time they so­ught ways to re­­verse this process. Even, the an­ti-fe­ma­le ide­ology has co­me un­der the gu­ise of re­li­gi­on from ti­me to ti­me.

12. Ac­cor­ding to the ba­sic so­ur­ces of Is­lam (the Ko­ran and Sunnah), men and wo­men are equ­al; they comp­le­te each ot­her. In terms of on­to­logy, as well as re­li­gi­ous res­pon­si­bi­lity, le­gal ca­pa­city, ba­sic rights and fre­edoms, disc­ri­mi­na­ti­on bet­we­en men and wo­men ac­cor­ding to ba­sic prin­cip­les is out of the qu­es­ti­on. Ho­we­ver, be­si­des the­se ba­sic prin­cip­les, a so­ci­al and cul­tu­ral en­vi­ron­ment in which Is­lam emer­ged and de­ve­lo­ped, par­ti­cu­larly the pat­ri­arc­hal fa­mily struc­tu­re has be­en ef­fec­ti­ve in the de­ter­mi­na­ti­on of the sta­tus of wo­men. This si­tu­ati­on is the re­ason why dif­fe­rent con­cepts of wo­men ha­ve emer­ged in Is­la­mic com­mu­ni­ti­es.

13. In un­ders­tan­ding and in­terp­re­ting the ver­ses of the Ko­ran con­cer­ning wo­men, the pro­cess of so­ci­al-cul­tu­ral oc­ca­si­ons of the ver­ses and li­te­ral me­anings, as well as the aims that we­re ta­ken as a ba­sis sho­uld be ta­ken in­to con­si­de­ra­ti­on. In ad­di­ti­on, ta­king furt­her steps con­cer­ning the so­ci­al and le­gal sta­tus of wo­men are not aga­inst the spi­rit of the Ko­ran. In ad­di­ti­on, in the light of the Ko­ran’s ba­sic prin­cip­les and the Prop­het Mo­ham­mad’s ge­ne­ral at­ti­tu­de and prin­cip­les con­cer­ning wo­men, it sho­uld be re­gar­ded that all nar­ra­ti­ons and in­for­ma­ti­on, as if they we­re as­so­ci­ated with se­xu­al disc­ri­mi­na­ti­on and des­pi­sed wo­man for be­ing wo­man and dep­ri­ved of the­ir ba­sic rights and fre­edoms, are eit­her dis­tor­ted, or unt­rue. Be­ca­use of abo­ve men­ti­oned narrations and information falsely attributed to the Prophet, ac­cu­sing Is­lam and the Prop­het Mo­ham­mad is ne­it­her sci­en­ti­fic nor et­hi­cal.

14. The re­mo­val of all the abo­ve-men­ti­oned fal­si­ti­es con­cer­ning wo­men de­pends on a pro­per edu­ca­ti­on. As a mat­ter of fact, one of the ba­sic aims of our Re­pub­lic and its modernization concept is to imp­ro­ve the sta­tus of wo­men wit­hin the fa­mily and so­ci­ety. At­ta­ining this go­al de­pends on gu­aran­te­eing the rights of edu­ca­ti­on and emp­loy­ment of fe­ma­les, pro­vi­ding them with equ­al op­por­tu­ni­ti­es, and en­co­ura­ging them by means of po­si­ti­ve disc­ri­mi­na­ti­on. The­re­fo­re, pers­pec­ti­ves and app­li­ca­ti­ons, which li­mit, rest­rict or ha­ve the pos­si­bi­lity of li­mi­ting or rest­ric­ting girls’ and wo­men’s op­por­tu­ni­ti­es for edu­ca­ti­on and emp­loy­ment sho­uld be rescru­ti­ni­zed and ne­ces­sary re­gu­la­ti­ons sho­uld be imp­le­men­ted to this end.

15. In Is­la­mic cul­tu­re, mar­ri­age is re­gu­la­ted as an ag­re­ement bet­we­en two par­ti­es de­pen­ding on the­ir free will. The­re is no spe­ci­al ce­re­mony per­for­med ot­her than the pre­sen­ce of wit­nes­ses. The prac­ti­ce, which is known as a re­li­gi­ous mar­ri­age, is the pro­duct of his­to­ric, re­li­gi­ous and le­gal con­di­ti­ons pe­cu­li­ar to Tur­key. Ho­we­ver, in vi­ew of spo­uses whom they ha­ve the rights by me­ans of mar­ri­age may not be lost, it is im­por­tant to re­com­mend that re­li­gi­ous mar­ri­age must be ful­fil­led af­ter of­fi­ci­al mar­ri­age.

16. Alt­ho­ugh the con­ti­nu­ity of the mar­ri­age is the ba­sic aim, the Is­la­mic re­li­gi­on ac­cepts the right to end this mar­ri­age when the­re is conf­lict bet­we­en the two spo­uses and di­vor­ce is to be nec­ces­sary. Di­vor­ce is per­mit­ted, ta­king in­to con­si­de­ra­ti­on the aims and le­gal pro­ce­du­res of the Ko­ran and the Prop­het which ha­ve be­en up­held.

17. The is­sue of Mus­lim wo­men marr­ying non-Mus­lim men will be dis­cus­sed in de­ta­il in the next con­sul­ta­ti­on me­eting.

18. The is­sue of wit­nes­sing, as men­ti­oned in the ver­se con­cer­ning debts and, the dif­fe­ren­ce re­sul­ting from a wo­man’s pas­si­ve ro­le in com­mer­ci­al ac­ti­vi­ti­es un­der the con­di­ti­ons of that pe­ri­od wo­uld not inc­lu­de a ge­ne­ral ar­ran­ge­ment. The ot­her re­la­ted ver­ses clearly in­di­ca­te this mat­ter. The­re­fo­re, the dif­fe­ren­ce in the ver­se re­gar­ding debts can­not be ac­cep­ted as an in­tel­lec­tu­al short­co­ming of wo­men.

19. In ge­ne­ral, the re­gu­la­ti­on of wo­men’s sha­res dif­fe­rently in in­he­ri­tan­ces ha­ve a di­rect re­la­ti­on with the fact that men have mo­re fi­nan­ci­al res­po­si­bi­lity in dif­fe­rent are­as compared to the womens’. On the ot­her hand, this sti­pu­la­ti­on can be chan­ged with the con­sent of both si­des in case that wo­men ha­ve mo­re ne­eds and that men wo­uld ha­ve less fi­nan­ci­al res­pon­si­bi­li­ti­es.

20. Wo­men be­ing exempt from ri­tu­als un­der spe­ci­al con­di­ti­ons (in menstruation period) is not be­ca­use of the­ir be­ing uncle­an, but to re­li­eve them of the­ir psycho­lo­gi­cal and physi­olo­gi­cal bur­dens. Ho­we­ver wo­men, in the­se si­tu­ati­ons, may re­ad the Ko­ran, and may al­so en­ter mos­qu­es (ma­sajid). Alt­ho­ugh many scho­lars op­po­se it, so­me scho­lars ha­ve sta­ted that wo­men may walk aro­und the Ka­’bah (ta­waf).

21. Wo­men may at­tend da­ily cong­re­ga­ti­onal pra­yers, in ad­di­ti­on to fe­ast pra­yers, (Eidhu’l-Fitr and Eidhu’l-Adha) Fri­day pra­yer and fu­ne­rals. The at­ten­dan­ce of wo­men and child­ren at Fri­day and fe­ast pra­yers sho­uld be en­co­ura­ged sin­ce it was a prac­ti­ce du­ring the ti­me of the Prop­het.

22. The word “kawwamun” which is men­tioned in the 34th ver­se of Surah Nisa gives rights and res­pon­sibilities to men. Although there are dif­ferent opinions on the literal meaning of the ver­se in ques­tion, it can­not be con­sidered as basis for violence within family which is widesp­read today. On the cont­rary, the prac­tices of the Prop­het should be taken as a role model in deter­mining how to treat women.

23. When we take the integrity of the related verses and the Prop­het’s Sunnah in­to con­sideration, pilg­rimage (hajj) is a sort of ritual wors­hip “during cer­tain months” namely Shaw­wal, Dhu’l Ka’da and Dhu’l-Hij­ja and waqfah (standing before Allah) at Arafat is to perform on the 9th day of Dhu’l-Hij­ja.

24. Those who un­der ob­ligation to ful­fill the pilg­rimage can per­form this wors­hip in any year they wish. Un­less there is a dan­ger to life and property, pilg­rimage should not be preven­ted. If the dan­ger to life and property con­tinues to exist pilg­rimage may be delayed.

25. If one goes directly to Mec­ca with the intention of pilgrimage and um­rah, entering the state of “ih­ram” can­not be taken place in the “Hill” region in Jed­dah.

26. Taking in­to con­sideration the different views of Is­lamic scholars concerning the violation of the ihram prohibitions, the prin­cip­le of easeness must be obeyed.

27. The view has been ac­cep­ted that waqfah at Muz­dalifah might be practiced after half of the night of feast day (Eid­hu’l Ad­ha) un­til dawn.

28. One should be aware that stoning of jamarat is one of the ob­ligations of the pilg­rimage. One should con­sult the views of Is­lamic scholars on the day and time of the prac­tice of throwing stones, which make the application easy.

29. The ver­ses clearly exp­ress that during the pilg­rimage (hajj) and um­rah, animals should be sac­rificed (hady) in the Haram region. Therefore, if the in­ten­ded pilg­rimage neces­sitates sac­rifice of an animal, these animals should be slaughtered only within the region of Haram.

30. Visiting the grave of the Prop­het Moham­mad in Medina before or af­ter the pilg­rimage and prayers forty times in the Prop­het’s Mas­jid (al-Mas­jid al-Nabawi) are not part of the specific rites of pilg­rimage. However, it is an app­rop­riate behaviour for pilg­rims to visit the grave of the Prop­het Moham­mad, and pray at the Prop­het’s Mas­jid.

31. In ad­dition to the pilg­rimage, the view that “Um­rah” is al­so a religious obligation, on­ce in life, has not been ac­cep­ted; but it is con­sidered as a confirmed tradition (Sunnah) of the Prop­het.

32. The duties of pilg­rimage should be comp­leted in the shor­test time pos­sib­le. This would both reduce the cost of the the pilg­rimage and en­courage the prac­tice of If­rad Pilg­rimage which do not neces­sitate the sac­rifice of an animal.

33. Two separate books must be prepared by a com­mis­sion of scholars, which will inc­lude theoretical and prac­tical in­for­mation on canonical jurisp­ruden­ce of a pilg­rimage as well as its his­torical, moral and cul­tural as­pects. The books must aim at reducing conf­licts on is­sues con­cer­ning the prac­tices in­vol­ved in pilg­rimages and must be supp­lemen­ted by photog­raphs, maps and sketc­hes. CD and videocas­set­te ver­sions of these books should al­so be prepared.

34. The view has been ac­cep­ted that a consultative meeting on pilg­rimage to be at­ten­ded by rep­resen­tatives of Is­lamic count­ries should be held in or­der to sol­ve prob­lems that might arise during the pilg­rimage.

35. There is a great neces­sity to trans­late the Koran in­to ot­her lan­guages and prepare its comp­rehen­sib­le exegesis (taf­sir). However, one should bear in mind that no trans­lation can subs­titute the original. Is­lamic scholars have ag­reed that trans­lations should not be cal­led the “Koran” and neit­her should they have the same status as the Koran.

Reciting the Koran (qiraat) in a proper man­ner while praying is a definite, per­manent religious duty ac­cor­ding to what is writ­ten in the Koran and the Prop­het Moham­mad’s exp­lanations and examp­les. It is a prac­tice which might be properly car­ried out when the Koran is recited in its original lan­guage. It is clear that many conf­licts and divisions will arise when every­body recites the Koran in their own lan­guage while praying.

Such prac­tices may al­so be harm­ful sin­ce they may damage social unity and deviate from the main tar­get. But con­sidering that “salah” (praying) can­not be neg­lec­ted nor post­poned, those who have no capability of reciting the original lan­guage of the Koran, may pray in their own lan­guage un­till they learn.

Sin­ce du’ah (suplication to Allah) means as­king God for his bles­sings, one can per­form this in his own lan­guage.

36. The adhan (call to prayer) symbolizes the presen­ce of Is­lam throug­hout the world. There is a con­sen­sus and a tradition of 15 cen­turies that it should be recited in its original lan­guage. Sin­ce the main aim of adhan is to remind Mus­lims that it is prayer time, the adhan has to be recited in its original lan­guage in or­der to reach all Mus­lims who speak various ton­gues.

37. Praying five times in a day is con­fir­med by the Koran, the Sunnah and with the ag­reement of all Mus­lims. However, the Prop­het Muham­mad’s some ac­tions demonst­rate that the noon and af­ter­noon prayers as well as the evening and night prayers can be unified (Jam’) (to unify the prayers wit­hin a time) in the form of preceding (taq­dim) and post­pon­ing (tak­hir) in case of jour­ney. Regar­ding all toget­her some nar­rations about Muham­mad’s unif­ying the salah (prayers) when he was resident, and the in­terp­retation of the com­panions (sahabah) it is as­cer­tained that it depends on jus­tified reasons only and not to be or­dinary habit.

38. The wors­hip of sac­rifice is wajib (something necessary, slightly lesser degree than fard) ac­cor­ding to Ebu Hanifah, while it is a Sunnah for many Muslim scholars.

But, if a wors­hip is not ob­ligatory, it does not mean that it is not a wors­hip, therefore to change the ways of its practice is not allowed. For this reason, per­for­ming a sac­rifice is not to be rep­laced by a fee.

Animals should be sac­rificed ac­cor­ding to the basic rules of Is­lam and one should ref­rain from pol­luting the en­viron­ment when sac­rificing an animal. If neces­sary, while sac­rificing an animal there is no prohibition to use app­rop­riate tech­nical met­hods for making animal un­con­cious. But the animals should be alive in that case.

39. The amount of zakah of fitrah is set ac­cor­ding to the basic daily requirements of a per­son.

The amount of zakah (alms) is deter­mined by the definition made by the Prop­het Moham­mad or with res­pect to the minimum wage for an in­dividual or ot­her kinds of in­dexes. But sin­ce the topic is broad and has many dimen­sions, it has been decided that it should be dis­cus­sed later at a comp­rehen­sive meeting.

By regards to pub­lic at­ten­tion.

 

The Presidency of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Turkey ©